Hockey Whooha
With
Wingnut
Of
To Dive Or Not To Dive
There is a loaded question for today's NHL players. At the slightest feel of an arm, or the fail pull of a stick do I fold up and fall like a wet rag? Or should I be the true gritting hockey player that can take a hit and still keep on playing like a warrior?
If they fold up and go down they have an 80-90% chance of drawing a penalty call and giving their team an advantage. They have a 1% chance of getting the dreaded "diving" call and putting their team a man down. Should they decide to play though the hold or stick work, there is a 50/50 chance the penalty will be called.
Seems like an easy choice for a newer player in today's league, it's all about advantage and victories (and fat contracts). It's not such an easy choice for some of the veterans around the league that is not the type of hockey that has been engrained into their style of play. Not to mention that they are not great actors and their attempts at the "dive" are so obvious they are the ones who wind up in the penalty box.
As a fan of the game and one who is fanatical about watching as many games as I can, the amount of diving has come to a point where it impacts the outcome of many games. I have watched many games where the ensuing power-play after a "dive" generated penalty results in a game winning goal. Regardless if the call would have been made without the dive, it takes away from the game and letting the abilities of the players decide the outcome.



